The Worst AI vs Influencer Debate I've Ever Reviewed ...Yet

Oh the Humane-ity: How a buzzy new hi-tech pin's failure to impress one tech reviewer led to a public reckoning of what it means to have influence. CREATOR NEWSLETTER Issue #230 | April 18, 2024 Last week, while I was sitting here getting all worked up about TikTok's development of artificial intelligence with the potential to upend the future earnings for that quarter of Gen Z'ers looking to enter the influencing game, I happened on a quirky review in The New York Times by Brian X. Chen about something called the AI Pin. Humane, the company that developed the pin, was founded by two married ex-Apple employees Imran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno, who raised $250 million from OpenAI and Microsoft to develop a stylish magnetic square that attaches to your shirt, has a laser beam and a camera and acts as an AI virtual assistant. Lest you get too excited, as I did, no, the laser cannot be used to blast away your enemies and/or Thanos. It is very small, and its functionality is limited to beaming a display onto your hand, which you rotate back and forth to unlock the device. Because two-factor authentication wasn't enough of a bitch, I guess. The AI Pin, according to the majority of reviewers who were sent an early demo, was a steal at $700 (not including the price of the monthly subscription to its proprietary cloud software) only if you desperately needed a cool-looking but cumbersome and often glitchy gadget to make you feel as hip and cutting-edge as that one guy on the news back in 2014 raving about Google Glasses. His job was Futurist the way Ken's job was beach. The life of the AI Pin is more taxing, as it burns through its battery in two hours when its not complaining of overheating and turning itself off completely. For all that work, Humane's functions include taking blurry photos at angles that can only be described as Skinamarink-ian, hallucinating incorrect answers to math problems and answering questions about bagels by telling you that carbs make you fat. Not going to lie, it sounds a lot like someone tried to replicate the unique experience of receiving a 3 a.m. Ambien work text from me in 2014. Or like, a really shitty JARVIS, which you know must make Elon so mad that somewhere out there, a Cybertruck just lost its wheels hitting 90 mph and a small child on its way down a residential street built way, way too close to Delaware Memorial Bridge and its last remaining load-bearing beam.  THE COMMENTS SECTION "We disagree on what my job is." —Marques Brownlee (@MKBHD) responding to criticism of his review of the AI Pin. This is more or less the same conclusion The New York Times review came to: you can feel Chen reaching for something to find remarkable in the potential the AI Pin represents, landing on the the weird flex but okay praising of the device for reccomending the correct type of clothing to pack on a trip to Hawaii. Once there, however, the Pin got a little gaslighty, denying the existence of a food truck selling loco moto directly in front of it. (We get it, Brian. You went to vacation. Ugh.) "While the Ai Pin was occasionally useful and impressive, it was wrong, unhelpful or inefficient enough times to drive me back to my phone," Chen ultimately shrugged. The subhed of the review was a little more pointed, saying "The $700 pin… can be helpful…until it struggles with tasks like doing math and crafting sandwich recipes." Now, this is all well and not-so-good, but what does it have to do with the creator economy? Well, despite such a lackluster review, no one (as far as we know) came after Mr. Chen on social media, claiming he failed at his job because he was critical of the product. Humane's co-founder, specifically, didn't go onto X to make a since-deleted subtweet about laughing in the face of his haters or some such; it's employees didn't feel the need to respond in Finnegan's Wake-length novels about how hard they'd worked only to be disrespected by a barbed title. The New York Times' didn't create a feeding frenzy of "builders" and builder-sympathizers who are now claiming to be fighting the good fight against their natural enemy, creators. Because that would be insane, right? There's a word reserved for reviewers and critics-- be they from Wirecutter, IGN or their own YouTube channel -- who give the appearance of being too deferential to a brand's product: they're called shills. Shills are literally (according to the Internet, or at least Red Letter Media) the worst thing a person can be, even if you're just a regular consumer super-fan and not, like, making it your job to present as a neutral authority on the subject. AND YET, when YouTuber Marques Brownlee posted a video review of the AI Pin to his YouTube channel MKBHD to his 18.6 million subscribers, the backlash was swift. The response could best be summed up in this insane take from smallbets.com founder Daniel Vassalo: "Hard to explain why, but with great reach comes great responsibility. Potentially killing someone else's nascent project reeks of carelessness. First, do no harm." Literally…what? Since when are we applying the hippocratic oath to professional reviewers? "We disagree on what my job is," replied Brownlee, displaying far more restraint than I did when the Jeremy Strong stans came for me earlier in the week. It's sad that Brownlee has been forced to explain, over and over in various media, that his work doesn't entail working as any company's hype machine, but it seems that everyone is conflating Brownlee's undoubtable reach with his being an influencer. Influencers get paid by brands to promote products, and that payment can come in the form of cash, swag or travel…all of which have monetary value and are taxable as income. Mr. Brownlee has responded with a brilliantly articulated response to the whole hubbub, which you can watch here, but it basically boils down to how interchangeable "reviewer" has become with influencer. "The thing about reviews is if they're not honest, they're basically useless," argues the YouTuber, who ends by saying that while he respects the people and companies out there taking the gamble at innovation, "my reviews are technically not for them." As to the claim that his review will single-handedly bring down this $250 million tech startup, Mr. Brownlee makes the fair assertion: "All that any honest review actually does is just accelerate what's already going on." - Drew Grant, Editorial Director NOTED BY LON HARRIS Twitch DJs Will Have to Start Paying Record Labels The days of copyright-free Twitch dance parties are coming to an end. By Lon Harris, Passionfruit Contributor → READ THE FULL STORY SPONSORED Need help staying organized as a creator? Rella's free project management software was built by creators to help streamline your creative output from idea to production, and when it comes time to monetize, Rella's paid platform can help you keep track of campaign performance, invoices, proposals, and more. Give structure a try, you'll be shocked at how much easier it is to be creative when your process is already taken care of. TRY RELLA IN THE BIZ Snapchat launched a new AI watermarks feature to ensure transparency by marking content generated by its AI tools, including visual indicators and metadata, to help users identify AI-created images and protect against misinformation. Substack has revamped its Notes feature to include capabilities like post embedding on external websites and multimedia support, enhancing its functionality and discoverability, and marking its first anniversary as a significant revenue generator for creators. Kickstarter introduced 'Late Pledges', allowing creators to continue raising funds indefinitely after their campaigns officially end, simplifying the process by integrating it directly on the platform instead of relying on third-party services. TikTok updated its shadowbanning policies to make temporary content recommendations ineligible if they repeatedly violate standards for the "For You" feed, potentially affecting creators who post content related to sensitive topics like mental and sexual health. This move aims to maintain a safer, broader audience-friendly feed, but the vague criteria could pose challenges for content creators. CULTURE Warhammer 40K Controversy Explained: Is the Imperium Going Woke? Even in the 41st millennium, you can't escape woke discourse. By Steven Asarch, Passionfruit Contributor READ THE FULL STORY → TIPS & TRICKS How To Set Up Google AdSense Payouts For Your Creator Website Or Blog It's time to get paid by AdSense on your website. By Rachel Kiley, Passionfruit Contributor READ THE FULL STORY → JOB BOARD Popcorn in Bed watched the 2000 film "X-Men." Emme Reacts watched season 1, episode 8 of "Invincible." The Media Knights watched 2011's "The Thing." BluTube watched season 1, episode 1 of "Fallout." YOUTUBE MADE ME DO IT We're loving watching one of our favorite Aussie podcasters Mr. Sunday Movies dissect the "Mad Max" franchise, including this breakdown of "Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome."  Go subscribe to their content at bigsandwich.co. Copyright © 2024 Passionfruit, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you signed up to get the latest tips, tricks, and trends in the creator economy from Passionfruit. Have an idea for our next big story or want to get featured? Email us at tips@passionfru.it Don't want to hear from us anymore? Click here to unsubscribe To view in your browser click here